Liberals have successfully marketed the activist government as a religion since 1912. Government's inability to provide for a better life for Americans has proven to be self-evident. Only capitalism cures these inadequacies and provides the ambition to reward greatness for society as a whole and provide the wealth to provide upper mobility and raise the disadvantaged out of poverty. Liberal Progressive thinking is the premise of counter-intuitive philosophy to coerce people into conforming to government-managed social engineering projects to attain equality. This is regressive thought on its face. TheFiscals call it the progressivirus because it acts very much like a computer virus without a firewall. The debased attitude is passed from generation to generation by elders, parents, mentor or authoritative figures that discourage young people to contribute by self-improvement and proactivity to contribute to a democratic republican society. The outcome of these false paradigms and dictums is the infantilization of the future of the middle class. This statist approach to mitigating societal ill is leading the next generation into intellectual servitude.
The American people have been led by the nose to go to the polling stations to cast a vote without real knowledge of the issues or the character of the candidates they are voting for. This requires individual desire and motivation to seek the facts and disallow intuitions to manipulate based on media imagery propaganda, short sound bites we hear on the television as repeated catchphrases heard at the water cooler at work or expressed by the streetcorner storyteller. These incomplete sentences or thought by others have taken as fact permits entire generations to lead rudderless lives. This quickly becomes a society without purpose. In the vacuum, the government is more relevant in daily life than hegemony between citizens in a community assisting one another without government intrusion. The age-old fallacy that Government's role in society is to be a better caretaker for the lazy and poor while failing in the veteran of war is a perfect example of this dystopia. This is not a rational public policy or sustainable for the nation with a volunteer army. Imagine a day when no one would enlist in the military? This is a classic political cognitive dissonance that has brought down pinnacle powers in the past. We TheFiscals simply rephrased it as the progressivirus infected outcome.
Since Statists only seek to be directors, they will never reform or change course. This political circumstance cannot be overemphasized in this manuscript. Statists will always believe the people are the bad actors not the script in their storyline, not their poorly written screenplay. Whether on the right side politics or the left, liberal statist especially, will lead us on a long meandering path to unhappiness, until we eventually realize it is only a 'cul de sac' of unanswered grievances. A society in melancholy will not realize high tax serfdom finally implodes into civil disobedience and strife. In this scenario, the Democratic Party are the lions of this dangerous jungle. A wilderness lacking sunlight always in the comfort of the shade sustains poverty until it succumbs to it. The by-product of this mediocrity is a majority political party of grievance of registered as Democrats or the twice the size of registered Independents. Both political parties are so fragile that simply eliminating the IRS, the Democratic Party would no longer be politically relevant in American society.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson
This politically bipolar philosophy has dominated the highest levels of academia from 1912 to 2012. Psychiatrist Dr. Lyle Rossiter has studied the liberal's mental disorder. He shares his findings in his book called "The Liberal Mind'. He understands the similarities with those affected by bipolar personality disorder and criminality. It is clear that the similarities are abundant between both. Common in both persons is distorting equality with the benevolent right instead of a human commitment to each other. The premise that the collective one can replace an individual desire to overachieve and to prefer to live someone else's life in a virtual world is the falsehood. It is also an impossibility of a great distortion to instill such delusions of well-being to the American People. Psychologists out of the mainstream, have clearly found evidence that the belief in collectivism facilitates ineptitude, and the inability for a large group of citizens to reach for a better life. The Religion of Government as a political theory must cease. It will not lead to the eradication of poverty or peace on earth. Totalitarianism-Socialism and another form of statism have murdered and starved more people than any other form of government system the world has ever known.
Time and time again, Nation-States have attempted communal based societies, and have failed to advance upper mobility and for its citizens. The false perception that Government's role in society is to replace the role of the community's religious institution's inspiring hope prevails until bankruptcy. Government leaders as inspirational provocateur only lead to an aimless society of unhappy people overtaxed. Government regulation suppresses initiative. It disguises its institutional incompetence and ineffectiveness. Inefficient Government is what statist liberals in big business need to profit at the expense of the average breadwinner or young laborers. Even German Philosopher Karl Marx author of the Communist Manifesto in 1848 expresses an understanding of the power of the people to refuse to pay taxes to any King Monarch or High Preist as means to the ultimate people's revolution. Yet with great duplicity, Marx includes the gradual income tax as one of the vital pillars for the achievement of a utopian society without social classes. The following explanation by Marx perfect understanding of the power to tax and a misuse libertarianism ethos by a communist trying to explain to the German people right to oppose the illegitimate government by refusing to pay taxes. This theory cannot disguise the political bipolarity of totalitarianism.
The Federal Government of the United States was once guarantor of liberty and guardian of self-reliance. Today it has been reframed by statists as a Life Insurance Company for low-income wage earners and a small army of low-wage soldiers.
Gentlemen, the public prosecutor has described the refusal to pay taxes as a measure "which shakes the foundations of society." The refusal to pay taxes has nothing to do with the foundations of society.
Generally speaking, why do taxes, the granting or the refusal to pay taxes, play such a role in the history of constitutionalism? The reason is very simple. Just as serfs purchased privileges from the feudal lords with ready money, so did entire nations purchase privileges from feudal monarchs with ready money. Monarchs needed money for their wars with foreign nations and especially for their struggle against the feudal lords. The more trade and industry developed the greater grew their need for money. But the third estate, the middle classes, grew to the same extent and disposed of increasing financial resources; and in the same degree, they purchased liberties from the monarchs using taxes. To make sure of these liberties they retained the right at definite intervals to renew the monetary obligations, i.e., the right to vote or to refuse to vote taxes. You can trace the details of this development especially well in English history.
In medieval society, therefore, taxes were the only bond between the emerging bourgeois society and the ruling feudal state. This bond compelled the state to make concessions to bourgeois society to meet its obligations and adjust itself to its growth. In modern states this right to grant and refuse taxes has been turned by bourgeois society into a means of controlling the government, the body administering its common interests.
You will find that partial tax refusal is an integral part of every constitutional mechanism. This type of tax refusal operates whenever a budget is rejected. The current budget is voted only for a definite period; moreover after being prorogued the chambers must be reconvened after a very short interval. It is impossible for the Crown to make itself independent. Rejection of a budget means a definite tax refusal if the cabinet does not win a majority in the new chamber or if the Crown does not nominate a cabinet by the wishes of the new chamber. The rejection of a budget is, therefore, the parliamentary form of a refusal to pay taxes. This form could not be employed in the conflict under consideration because a constitution did not yet exist, but had first to be produced.
But a refusal to pay taxes as it occurred here, a refusal which not only rejects a new budget but prohibits even the payment of current taxes, is by no means exceptional. It happened very frequently in the Middle Ages. Even the old German Imperial Diet and the old feudal Diets of Brandenburg passed resolutions refusing to pay taxes. Nor is there any lack of examples in modern constitutional states. The refusal to pay taxes led in Britain in 1832 to the downfall of Wellington's cabinet. And in Britain, it was not Parliament which decided to refuse taxes, but the people who proclaimed and carried out this decision on its authority. Britain, however, is the historic land of constitutionalism.
Far be it from me to deny that the English revolution, which brought Charles I to the scaffold, began with a refusal to pay taxes or that the North American revolution, which ended with the Declaration of Independence from Britain, started with a refusal to pay taxes. The refusal to pay taxes can be the harbinger of unpleasant events in Prussia too. It was not John Hampden, however, who brought Charles I to the scaffold, but only the latter's own obstinacy, his dependence on the feudal estates, and his presumptuous attempt to use force to suppress the urgent demands of the emerging society. The refusal to pay taxes is merely a sign of the dissidence that exists between the Crown and the people, merely evidence that the conflict between the government and the people has reached a menacing degree of intensity. It is not the cause of the discord or the conflict, it is merely an expression of this fact. At the worst, it leads to the overthrow of the existing government, the existing political system. The foundations of society are not affected by this. In the present case, moreover, the refusal to pay taxes as a means of society's self-defense against a government which threatened its foundations.
(Karl Marx, Neue Rheinische Zeitung No. 231 and 232, 1849)
This imaginative social condition is passed on through generations through Public schooling by cause and effect teaching experiments and stimuli, and response experimentation methods were to ascertain if people "feel knowledge" instead of coping skills to overcome objections and redeem themselves after failure. This ability is the most valuable human asset to accomplish tasks under pressure and make deadlines. The power of education is to instill based on curiosity using an acute sense of resourcefulness not able to answer trivia on multiple choice test.
A disbelieving social disorder evolves in schooling while in fact, it is a regressing the human desire to succeed. This disorder is similar to a person who is suffering from Bipolar disorder, feeling more positive, less depressed, less moody and then stops taking his or her medication because he did not need it in the first place. This false sense of equalities has created Liberal Government entitlement programs that are fallacies of self-control. It also procures a lax unaccountable divorce law that has led the Nation into moral bankruptcy as 50% of Americans cannot provide for a nuclear family. This social disenfranchisement that [50%] of our population is dependent on a Government subsidy in one form or another. Any generation of Americans that fall into this secular belief system will continue to elect advocates of statism in perpetuity. Conservative methodology has morphed into suspect conservatives judge appointed to the Supreme Court, by Republican Presidents.